This is artwork reminiscent of the artwork of the original. I think you're being overly critical. Here, I can prove it: I see a picture of an armored man carrying a sword and a shield. Which picture am I referring to?
Flames/smoke might be in reference to the "Magic" part of the title. I think Patrick's right. You might be a tad overly critical about this one. Usually you're spot on. I think Kicksnarker has made you jaded. ;)
I think it evokes the original artwork while still looking like a modern action stance. Where does the smoke come from? Maybe the artwork was too big for the cover so they framed it with smoke in order to better display the title. I've worked with layout before and had to make a decision like that, sacrifice the level of detail in the artwork to display the title or display the artwork with the possibility of the title being obscured. I don't know, that's just a guess. It could also have been the artist's decision to draw in the smoke, like a warrior stepping out of the mists of time (that's the first thing it made me think of). I don't think the changes makes it bad or poorly done, just different. While I would question the need to put new artwork on JUST the cover of a reprint of an old book - apart from the need to differentiate it from the original - I don't really see the big deal. And besides, a lot of OSR stuff has artwork that evokes movement and action because nobody really draws high school quality line drawings of people just standing motionless anymore. But you're entitled to dislike it for whatever reason. I don't really like it myself, but an artist is getting paid to make new art so I think that's cool by itself.
I'm not thrilled by the artwork either. I'd prefer not having what I call "fantastic" figures. The original does look more "normal."
As a welder and worker in steel, I can assure you that Arnold Schwarzenegger couldn't lift -- much less wield -- any of the swords found in today's artwork. I prefer a more realistic feel.
As for the "smoke" -- or whatever -- the only thing it evokes in me is; "What the heck is that?"
Who are they targeting with this release? If they want to sell this set to old schoolers, why the cover that will appeal to 3E/4E players? If they want to sell it to the new schoolers... well, why reprint OD&D?
I certainly agree the art needs to be "different" in that you won't want confusion over which printing you're buying (though they didn't care with Red Box). I think another poster is right about being overly critical but I agree with you that the art is overstated for the content. I even agree this could potentially jeopardize their sales by not being true to the original. But, dangit, I can see why it happens. I think this is the same type of miscalculation that gave us 4E. They're unable to view a product through any lens other than "we need to attract new blood". But they don't realize how much of their sales (especially with a product like this) is going to be coming from grouchy grognards like us.
yeah, not a fan either. Tons of artists can do awesome OS work, evocative, without the taste of new which this one has. Hire one of them, WoTC. Totally possible to come up with something, purely OS in style, that will appeal to the younger buyers too. Those young folks are going to be ones interested in the old, they're not going to be swayed by a generic new-ish looking illo.
Well said. They should be employing some of the newer OSR artists doing such fine work or hire some of the original artists. This will not appeal to grognards and offers nothing new to younger players.
I'd be perfectly happy to see 'better' art in the re-prints - some of the original stuff is dire. But it should still capture the same feel, which this fails to do.
Personally I like both. The new cover looks great and is like a new take on the original. I think they should include the original cover/art on the next page however.
I don't know. The original box featured some of the worst artwork in any RPG product ever published. Anything would be an improvement, although it would have been cool to get guys like Dee, Otus, Holloway, etc to do a sketch or two for old time's sake.
Haven't they changed the appearance of the books for all of the limited reprints? Make them look close to, but not exactly the same as, the originals? So this isn't new. I can see not liking it, but it's what they've been doing for the whole line of LERs. Reference the original, with a new cover.
Let me retry (initial comment a bit harsh): I like the new art. It will probably get me to buy a copy because of it. I am unclear on whether the new art was a good move however if enough of the old guard that might consider buying it are turned off by the new stuff.
It does seem very odd they'd change the cover of a "reprint". I was never a fan of the art in the early editions of D&D. I thought it crappy and amateurish. The new cover art looks good to me, but it really doesn't belong there. If you're doing a reprint, do a proper reprint--especially if it's for a loyal fan base.
Tiger II
-
I got around to painting the 1:100 scale Bergman Tiger II model I'd been
mucking about with in Blender and printed on my elderly Ender 3 in eSun
PLA+....
More Lejendary Adventures
-
Lejendary Adventures had its heyday from 1999 to 2008 or so. Not bad when
you think about it. The game had its own problems (a lot of problems), but
the...
FKR logo
-
I like logos, can't help it, I just go. I was talking to a friend of mine
about our love of the FKR-style games and the thought occurred to me that
maybe a...
On Emotion in the Creative Process
-
I have written a lot in this blog about AI and machine learning, and have
probably established my credentials as a sceptic. It is not 'intelligence'
and ...
Buck Rogers Boxed Set XXVc (1990)
-
From the web:
The XXVc Role-Playing Game describes the world of the 25th Century in vivid
detail. Join the forces of the New Earth Organization and help ...
Creation Is An Act Of Sheer Will!
-
If you are only familiar with the movies, John Hammond just seems like a
dedicated (but naive) scientist with a dream. However, the original book
version w...
March of 5, 10, and 15 years ago
-
This blog is now old enough that I can look back 15 years. I'll also dip
into what was happening 10 and 5 years ago.
Self-indulgent? How dare you! I'll d...
The Ring of the Battle Maiden
-
By Ashley Warren Self Published 5e Level 1 A legend speaks of a lost ring
that belonged to famed battle maiden Dagmar the Unyielding: traverser of
the real...
It’s Tolkien Reading Day
-
I recently started rereading *The Silmarillion*. I had last read it over
two decades ago. I liked it then but I’m really enjoying it this time!
Despite b...
Jonstown Jottings #89: Eyes’ Rise
-
Much like the Miskatonic Repository for Call of Cthulhu, Seventh Edition,
the Jonstown Compendium is a curated platform for user-made content, but
for ma...
Stonehell: Those are permanent you know!
-
Session 224 was played on 8/2/23
Morgana, Magic User (Rob)
Blotto, Goblin Fighter (Lanse)
Koltic, Cleric 7 (NPC)
Aroon, Fighter 5 (NPC)
Jameth, Fighter 5 ...
Eschat-Jihad and the Red Lands
-
*an Unbalanced Skirmish Game of Deception, Madness and Causality Horror,
set in the Eklipsis/Prescience Wars paracosm.*
(No, I haven’t actually worked out...
The Awful Lights
-
This past weekend I was at Breakout Con, running *The Awful Lights*. This
is an alpha edition of a wilderness/zombie survival paramilitary RPG,
heavily i...
Osr anchorites?
-
It's been a long time since I listened to any osr podcasts. Anchor was a
lot of fun. I'm not sure if the community is still going? I deleted the
app ...
Fudging, lying and cheating
-
*[D&D] is a game, and outcomes shouldn’t always be predictable! Removing
the risk of failure also removes most of the fun. *(From an upcoming random
encoun...
Playtest Sessions 8-11
-
I stopped posting session summaries for my games a few months ago because
it seemed like nobody was reading them, but I recently heard from a couple
of p...
Chaos War Dogs
-
Welcome back to the Vault! My gaming partner and I had a fun day at the
Meme Team doubles last weekend, placing mid-table results wise. My eye is
now lo...
New edition of Starmada! Huzzah!
-
So Daniel Kast's *Starmada* has a new, 30th anniversary edition out. You
can get the pdf from WargameVault (the wargame store of the DriveThru
people) or...
Gratification in the Gaming Age...
-
There's no doubt we live in an age of instant gratification. There isn't
much we can't get immediately. Instant books, instant food, games, and
instant mov...
On Sinless Art
-
I just want to share some of the art from the project.
Get your own copy:
https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/product/472142/Sinless
---------...
ShadowDark Magic Items
-
The next campaign I run will use the ShadowDark RPG. I'm not sure when
that'll be (I'm hoping a little later this year), but ShadowDark is my
choice. I'v...
Corkboards & Curiosities: a New Angle on DMing
-
Here's a new YouTube channel that's absolutely worth your time. There's
some clever ideas in this video I will absolutely be implementing in my
campaign...
Xandering, Jaquaysing, or Arneson-ing the Dungeon?
-
Yet another gamer firestorm arose shortly after the passing of Janelle
Jaquays when it was noted that Justin Alexander had changed a rather well
known p...
The 4th Category
-
New Year, New Release — and this one is a monument all to itself, a great
fit for the 50th Anniversary of the launch of D&D™...
Introducing *The 4th Cat...
GLOG Class: Bioweapon
-
I got this idea from mad gods on bear blog.
Crab Evo from Kagaku Sentai Dynaman
A thousand soldiers were slain. Too many to be tragic--this is just a fact...
The Economy Engine, v0.2
-
I made a thing. For D&D 3rd edition, so it might not be that interesting to
a lot of people. But I made it and I think it’s cool. The 3rd edition
Dungeon M...
D&D Turns 50, and Something Else Turns 200
-
2024 marks the 50th anniversary of the publication of *Dungeons & Dragons*.
Nailing down the exact release date of a product as informally produced as
D...
*'s in SpaaaaaAaaaace
-
A lot of SF (including a certain 2D6 RPG grandaddy) deal with ancient
aliens taking humans from Earth and dropping them, fleas and all, on one or
more w...
What Else Have I Got in Me?
-
Brechewold's been done for a little while. Still incredibly pumped to have
this labor of love out in the company of LotFP's marvelously creative body
of ...
Last move - to self-hosting!
-
As my vote regarding Substack in the “marketplace of ideas”, I’m moving to
self-hosting.
I’m now at (and hopefully staying for a long time at)
Blog: ht...
Happy New Year, and the annual DriveThruRPG report.
-
Happy New Year
I wish everybody a Happy New Year! I have much to be thankful for in 2023,
especially family, friends, and work. I want to thank everyone wh...
Time Rolls On
-
Today is December 31, 2023, in the mid-afternoon. In less than ten hours it
will be 2024. 2023 2023 was a good year. But all years are good years. Both
goo...
Play Report: Skull Mountain
-
At the end of the last Skull Mountain session the PCs had retreated to
safety at Owen's redoubt, met with visiting elves, and recovered from
injuries ...
Clerics of the Flanaess, Part 1
-
It’s been a while since we’ve had one of these articles, but the pages of
Dragonne Magazine have once more released their secrets from that alternate
unive...
-
Heya folks, the 21st Salt Mine book, Import Export, has hit the digital
shelves! In the 21st book we follow Aaron Haddock-codename Stigma-as he
tries to ...
Moving On...
-
So, my D&D 5e experiment has blown up the lab in a puff of green smoke
leaving my face blackened like Wile E. Coyote after a failed roadrunner
Acme trap...
How to Keep Megadungeons Fresh
-
People often consider megadungeons boring. Not because the play style is
boring, but because they are in the same locale for a majority of the
campaign. If...
The Blade Itself
-
I just finished listening to the audiobook of The Blade Itself, volume one
in Joe Abercrombie’s The First Law trilogy. This was my first exposure to
his wo...
Genteel Magistrate at FenCon XVIII
-
Victorious author Mike Stewart will be a guest at FenCon XVIII this weekend
at the Sheraton DFW Airport hotel, 4440 W. John Carpenter Freeway, Irving,
TX, ...
This is an Important Game Mechanic
-
*"That's the GM's Regional Map from my AOWG. And it's a damned good
regional map. It's not a good map for a Simple Homebrew Campaign. It does
some s$&...
Clean Your Room
-
Looking back at my little blog here. That last post… wow, I was having fun
playing WOW Classic! That was August of 1999 and I was having a blast… it
was ...
My RPG Zine Trilogy is on Kickstarter!
-
I can't believe I didn't post about it here!
The Dead are Coming, Screams Amongst the Stars and Running Out of Time are
on *Kickstarter right now!* Thes...
Maximum HP 004, one week to go
-
Just one week to go for Maximum HP issue #004, the undead. We are pushing
through stretch goals and wracking up contributions for the best issue yet.
We...
Steve Jackson Interview
-
James Maliszewski recently did an interview with Steve Jackson over on his
Grognardia blog. Steve chats about the beginnings of The Fantasy Trip and
upcomi...
Undermountain Map Origins
-
As documented on the Ruins of Undermountain sales page, "TSR didn't
actually use Ed Greenwood's original maps," at least not in their entirety.
This post d...
WB:FMAG Total Print Sales
-
Hello Folks,
The last time I did a quick sales report was in September 2018.
I pulled reports from Amazon, Lulu and DrivethruRPG from October to current
fo...
The Minotaur for Old-School Essentials
-
*Minotaur*
*Requirements:* Minimum STR 9, Minimum CON 9
*Prime Requisite:* STR and CON
*Hit Dice:* 1d10
*Maximum Level:* 8
*Armor:* Leather, including shield...
WIZARDS OF POHJOLA
-
Init +0
Melee Atk
• sword or dagger +1 (1d5 or 1d3)
Ranged Atk
• hot iron sparks +3 (1d4+2 to two targets within 20' but not closer than
5')
AC 14
HD 12d...
Dungeons & Dragonmead Fall Schedule
-
*As you know, I run public classic Dungeons & Dragons games at **The Loaded
Die**/Metro Detroit Game Night's Board Game Nigh at **Dragonmead**, in
Warren...
D&D Sling Damage vs. Large Targets
-
In many early editions of D&D, weapons were assigned two damage values: one
for small/medium targets (i.e. man-sized) and one for large targets (giants
and...
James A. Smith, Jr. Memorial Video
-
A beloved father, devoted friend, and D&D Dungeon Master extraordinaire. We
miss you! To view video, click here Memorial Video
Note - The original video...
Let's Talk About Pacing!
-
The idea, I think, is that the RPG is ultimately about the long game. Even
rolling back to the early days of Basic & Expert, the goal of the player
was...
Profane and Profound Prep Part 2
-
This is part 2 of my work to edit my magic items for a DMsGuild release,
along with adding cursed items along the way. Here is part 1. Bone of a
Saint 8000...
SHORT BREAK.
-
I'm going to take a break for a week or so and will start up again in the
New Year. Thanks for reading and we'll start with Level 6 when I get back.
Iain Lovecraft, 3D Sculptor
-
Nope, it's got nothing to do with Cthulhu. I just did a video conversation
with Iain Lovecraft, who designs 3D miniatures and terrain. If you're not
doi...
New website!
-
Slowly but surely, all the content here will make its way — in updated
form! — to my new website: timbannock.com. For fairly obvious reasons, that
site wil...
Please Update Your Link!
-
If you're seeing this, it means your link to the Greyhawk Grognard blog is
out of date.
Please update your link to www.greyhawkgrognard.com (RSS feed is
h...
Mord Mar - Session 6
-
We weren't able to play Mord Mar last week, due to a family funeral. This
week we played on Monday for the first time, due to kids returning to
school and ...
A Small, Quiet Plea
-
There has been a great deal of discussing political agendas, social
grievances, and personal attacks within the little corner of gaming that is
my hobby....
Don’t Sleep It’s Broken
-
Expanding/editing my comments from What Makes Something Broken G+ thread:
“Broken”, for me, is anything that makes normal character choices, tactics,
or ro...
Swords & Wizardry Light-Themed Birthday Party
-
Last month, my wife and I helped our oldest to celebrate his birthday in
style. Ever since 2013, we have hosted a themed birthday party for our
now-15-ye...
a hideous disappointment - should capture the amateur zine like quality of old not newschool superheroes - i was tempted now im not
ReplyDeleteOh, I'm still getting it. I'm just pissed that they couldn't even get this one right, after screwing up the adnd and second Ed covers of the reprints
DeleteThis is artwork reminiscent of the artwork of the original. I think you're being overly critical. Here, I can prove it:
ReplyDeleteI see a picture of an armored man carrying a sword and a shield. Which picture am I referring to?
that is the only thing they have in common.
Deletenormal man as a hero compared to brutish thug as...
armor, stance, action... about the only thing in common is they are both righties
wtf is it with the flames or smoke coming off the new guy? is he straight from hell?
again, the new art does not reflect upon the source material, unless one is looking at a funhouse mirror...
Flames/smoke might be in reference to the "Magic" part of the title. I think Patrick's right. You might be a tad overly critical about this one. Usually you're spot on. I think Kicksnarker has made you jaded. ;)
DeleteI have my OCE right in front of me, and this SIR, is NO OCE!
Deletegrrrrrrrr...
I need breakfast - more grumpy than usual it seems - still dont like the new artwork
I think it evokes the original artwork while still looking like a modern action stance. Where does the smoke come from? Maybe the artwork was too big for the cover so they framed it with smoke in order to better display the title. I've worked with layout before and had to make a decision like that, sacrifice the level of detail in the artwork to display the title or display the artwork with the possibility of the title being obscured. I don't know, that's just a guess. It could also have been the artist's decision to draw in the smoke, like a warrior stepping out of the mists of time (that's the first thing it made me think of).
DeleteI don't think the changes makes it bad or poorly done, just different.
While I would question the need to put new artwork on JUST the cover of a reprint of an old book - apart from the need to differentiate it from the original - I don't really see the big deal. And besides, a lot of OSR stuff has artwork that evokes movement and action because nobody really draws high school quality line drawings of people just standing motionless anymore.
But you're entitled to dislike it for whatever reason. I don't really like it myself, but an artist is getting paid to make new art so I think that's cool by itself.
I'm not thrilled by the artwork either. I'd prefer not having what I call "fantastic" figures. The original does look more "normal."
DeleteAs a welder and worker in steel, I can assure you that Arnold Schwarzenegger couldn't lift -- much less wield -- any of the swords found in today's artwork. I prefer a more realistic feel.
As for the "smoke" -- or whatever -- the only thing it evokes in me is; "What the heck is that?"
Nope! I'm with Erik on this one.
It looks like an updated version of the original by another author. I don't see why the angst about it.
DeleteThey are going to keeo it in the brand.
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't make sense at all.
ReplyDeleteWho are they targeting with this release? If they want to sell this set to old schoolers, why the cover that will appeal to 3E/4E players? If they want to sell it to the new schoolers... well, why reprint OD&D?
they are trying to hit all markets, and it doing so, may miss all of their targets.
Deletedamn shame
2nd Edition has always been my preferred play set, though I also play the older editions.
DeleteThey did not market this cover for me.
The target market is collectors. Not many others are going to spend 100 bucks for this.
DeleteThe interior artwork is unchanged, which is great but will be even more jarring compared to the covers.
ReplyDeleteI certainly agree the art needs to be "different" in that you won't want confusion over which printing you're buying (though they didn't care with Red Box). I think another poster is right about being overly critical but I agree with you that the art is overstated for the content. I even agree this could potentially jeopardize their sales by not being true to the original. But, dangit, I can see why it happens. I think this is the same type of miscalculation that gave us 4E. They're unable to view a product through any lens other than "we need to attract new blood". But they don't realize how much of their sales (especially with a product like this) is going to be coming from grouchy grognards like us.
ReplyDeleteyeah, not a fan either. Tons of artists can do awesome OS work, evocative, without the taste of new which this one has. Hire one of them, WoTC. Totally possible to come up with something, purely OS in style, that will appeal to the younger buyers too. Those young folks are going to be ones interested in the old, they're not going to be swayed by a generic new-ish looking illo.
ReplyDeleteTheir single biggest problem with this sort of thing is their desire that everything be done "in house."
DeleteThey need new "old" blood for these projects, not the "kids" they have working for them at present.
Well said. They should be employing some of the newer OSR artists doing such fine work or hire some of the original artists. This will not appeal to grognards and offers nothing new to younger players.
DeleteI'd be perfectly happy to see 'better' art in the re-prints - some of the original stuff is dire. But it should still capture the same feel, which this fails to do.
ReplyDeleteIt was called white box, not white books...
ReplyDeletePersonally I like both. The new cover looks great and is like a new take on the original.
ReplyDeleteI think they should include the original cover/art on the next page however.
As has already been said, anyone "thrilled" with D&D Next (not me) isn't going to "go" for this product, so why market it for them?
ReplyDeleteThis was obviously done for the "Grognards" and should have been marketed for such. Plain and simple.
I don't know. The original box featured some of the worst artwork in any RPG product ever published. Anything would be an improvement, although it would have been cool to get guys like Dee, Otus, Holloway, etc to do a sketch or two for old time's sake.
ReplyDeleteOr tramp.
DeleteOn the bright side, at least they didn't go the Pathfinder route and have the guy loaded down with 200lbs of weapons and gear.
ReplyDeleteHaven't they changed the appearance of the books for all of the limited reprints? Make them look close to, but not exactly the same as, the originals? So this isn't new. I can see not liking it, but it's what they've been doing for the whole line of LERs. Reference the original, with a new cover.
ReplyDeleteIsn't "mess with a classic" pretty much their mission statement?
ReplyDeleteI dunno, to me that looks a lot like a Superhero about to make his 8 attacks per round!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteLet me retry (initial comment a bit harsh): I like the new art. It will probably get me to buy a copy because of it. I am unclear on whether the new art was a good move however if enough of the old guard that might consider buying it are turned off by the new stuff.
DeleteIt does seem very odd they'd change the cover of a "reprint". I was never a fan of the art in the early editions of D&D. I thought it crappy and amateurish. The new cover art looks good to me, but it really doesn't belong there. If you're doing a reprint, do a proper reprint--especially if it's for a loyal fan base.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteMaybe they changed it because all the original cover art was plagiarized from other works?
ReplyDeleteAnd I sort of like it.
ReplyDeleteIt is very Savage Sword of Conan in appearance.
DeleteWhich is what the smoke fog is - it's steam from a super frosty morning - a la Frostgiants Daughter or something.
Ah! The Frost Giants Daughter, nice.
DeleteBut the helmet still needs the horns! :D