RPGNow

Showing posts with label lawsuit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lawsuit. Show all posts

Thursday, December 30, 2021

News - Ken "Turbo" Trbovitch Resigns as President of Servotronics


The "Turbo" saga appears to have come to a conclusion, with Ken "Turbo" Trbovitch resigning as President of Servotronics.

The lawsuit referred to below named Gary Con and Luke Gygax within its pages.

Earlier Tavern coverage here

THE BOARD OF SERVOTRONICS, INC. ANNOUNCES LEADERSHIP CHANGE (link to original article)

NEWS PROVIDED BY

Servotronics, Inc. 

Dec 27, 2021, 07:30 ET

ELMA, N.Y., Dec. 27, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Servotronics, Inc. (NYSE American - SVT) announced that Kenneth D. Trbovich has resigned as Chief Executive Officer and President and was removed as Chairman of the Board, after a nearly six-month-long internal investigation identified grounds for his termination.

While the Board of Directors conducts a search for a permanent replacement, the responsibilities of the CEO and President will continue to be carried out by other personnel, led by Chief Operating Officer James C. Takacs.

The Board's non-employee directors stated:  "Our highly skilled workforce and experienced management team have ensured that Servotronics continues to deliver on its reputation for meeting and exceeding government, defense, commercial, consumer and other customers' high standards for quality and reliability, which has been built over more than six decades. This team has delivered sequential sales growth in the second and third quarters of this year, while continuing to invest in people, product development, and production capabilities that are designed to position Servotronics for the future. We look forward to providing Jim Takacs and his team with the resources they need to continue executing, while the Board conducts an active search for a new CEO."

Today's announcement follows a previously disclosed internal investigation, authorized by the Board on June 8 when Mr. Trbovich was placed on administrative leave, one day after a then-employee filed a civil complaint making allegations regarding the executive's conduct. The investigation was undertaken by independent, outside counsel.

On Dec. 1, Mr. Trbovich was informed that grounds for termination were identified during the investigation and a Dec. 22 meeting was scheduled for the Board to hear from the executive and consider the matter. On Dec. 21, Mr. Trbovich resigned as CEO and President. At its Dec. 22 meeting, the Board accepted his resignation, removed him as Chairman, and based on the findings of the investigation determined that he committed willful malfeasance that would have justified termination. The Company has not disclosed other findings of the investigation, as they relate to personnel matters.

While the former executive remains a director, the Company does not intend to renominate him for election to the Board at the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders.

The Tavern is supported by readers like you. The easiest way to support The Tavern is to shop via our affiliate links. DTRPGAmazon, and Humble Bundle are affiliate programs that support The Tavern. 

You can catch the daily Tavern Chat podcast on AnchorYouTubeor wherever you listen to your podcast collection. - Tenkar 

Wednesday, September 29, 2021

A Breakdown of the Relevant Parts of the Turbo/Servotronics Lawsuit and the Mentions of Luke Gygax and Gary Con



I've been asked by multiple people over the last few days as to when I was going to address the Servotronics / Kenneth Trbovich lawsuit. Well, here we go...

I became aware of the "Turbo" lawsuit Saturday morning when a friend messaged me the PDF telling me I'd be interested. I started to read it, wondering why it would be of any concern to me when I started seeing "Gary Con", "Gygax" and "Luke Gygax" get mentioned in the filing - multiple times. A lot.

It then dawned on me that Kenneth Trbovich was "Turbo" from Gary Con. I now realized I had 104 pages of a dumpster fire. Really. You can snag your own copy of the Trbo Lawsuit at this link. I dare you to call it anything but a dumpster fire.

The allegations detailed within are beyond belief and fall along the lines of "throw everything into your lawsuit and see what sticks". More, literally, is more. 

It reads like the script to a Porky's reimagining. If only 10% is accurate, Turbo is a pretty shitty person. The thing is, there are exact dates given. Which likely means the plaintiff was documenting events as they happened. Leaving out the personal drama, it shows a dysfunctional business environment.

There are, however, some parts that are relevant. One allegation states that: "Trbovich’s compensation began to balloon, particularly after Gygax was appointed Chair of the Compensation Committee." (page 47) Turbo's compensation jumped 70% from 2019 to 2020Luke was appointed Chair of the Company's Independent Directors Committee and is also a member of the Company's Audit Committee. As Turbo and Luke are/were friends, and Turbo participated as either staff or as a volunteer at Gary Con for a number of years, this part doesn't look particularly great for Luke.

Yep, Luke was paid $85k a year as an Independent Director in 2020 by Servotronics.


Nor does Luke and Turbo going on a trip to Eastern Europe together, which kinda strains the idea of an "independent director must be completely independent and they cannot receive any compensation of any kind outside of Board stipends and reimbursement for legitimate Company expenses (such as travel to Board meetings)."(page 50)

Gary Con gets its first mention with: "Gary Con was (and is) a gaming convention owned and operated by Gygax, the “independent” director and the Chair of the Compensation Committee and Audit Committee Member." (page 52) It appears Servotronics employees were sent to the con on company time and compensation.

Then we apparently have a book written by Turbo and Luke: "In March 2019, Trbovich revealed to Pirrone that he (Trbovich) had co-authored with “independent” director Gygax a book for Gary Con. Trbovich used his nickname “Turbo” as a pen name. Trbovich implied to Pirrone that he used his pen name in an effort to conceal his identity from the Board, shareholders, and anyone else with an interest in the Trbovich Companies." (page 53). The book/module in question is Knight Fall, and yes, Turbo is credited along with Luke and Chris Clark.

Pages 60-61 give us: "Trbovich mentioned, for the first time, that he knew his travel with Luke Gygax was brought into question by the Whistleblower Complaint, as well as his spending on Noura Ibrahim." and "Specifically, Pirrone reported his concerns of corporate waste, fraud, dereliction of fiduciary duties, as well as other unlawful and unethical conduct, including, without limitation: (1) Trbovich’s Company-funded all-expenses-paid trips to Prague and Gary Con with “independent” director Luke Gygax, the Chair of the Company’s Compensation Committee; (2) Trbovich’s use of Company funds to support Gygax’s personal business ventures that are not legitimately related to the Company or the Company’s business interests; (3) Pirrone’s suspicion that Trbovich is a silent part-owner of Iron Wind (Mike Noe’s company) and Monster Fight Cub (Gygax’s company); and (4) information about Trbovich’s use of Company funds for trips and plane tickets for Servotronics contractors with whom Trbovich had admitted having a sexual relationship, quid pro quo, including Noura Ibrahim.

Page 65: "On November 15, 2019, CFO Bencel approached Pirrone to discuss the Company-funded business trips to Gary Con, involving Gygax, Grayson, and Redd. Pirrone shared dates and photographs from social media. Pirrone also reported to CFO Bencel the cross- country “business trip” involving Grayson and the aforementioned Candace (“Candy”) Miller."

Page 72: "For example, on January 28, 2020, Pirrone reported to CFO Bencel that he had found a link to a “streamed game event” from Gary Con where Beast Grayson (who was present on the Company’s dime and, in fact, reimbursed for his travel and lodging), participated in a live stream “celebrity” game with Gygax. Pirrone reported this information and suggested that these events are required by law to be referenced in the independence questionnaires for the Board. A short while later, HR Director Zechman emailed Pirrone, out of nowhere, requesting verification and additional information about the paid leave Pirrone had taken back in 2017."

Pages 73-74: "Reminder that when Ken had Luke Gygax and Jason Bear appointed to the board he had me punch up their resumes to make the case for their appointment. In the case of Jason, I believe, he also had me punch up the resume of Mike Noe, the president of Iron Wind Metals, which I suspect Ken of co-owning as the result of that fraudulent trip to Ohio where he forced me to be one of his "seconds" in a bonding ceremony with his mistress and then had me guard his tent while he was having sex with her. Ken used Mike's resume as "another candidate for consideration" to contrast against Jason. Basically radar chaff."

From Page 99 - This one I can personally attest to: "giving away hundreds or possibly thousands of dollars in OKC samples to gaming convention attendees—Trbovich’s friends—who had nothing to do with the Trbovich Companies;" Back in 2016 (17?) someone came to the booth with a bunch of knives and said "these are for you guys!" I had no clue who was giving it to us at the time, but now I do. Go figure.

Also page 99: "funneling corporate funds into Monster Fight Club and other businesses owned and/or operated by Officers and/or “Independent” Directors on the Board, which are wholly unrelated to Servotronics or OKC;"

Finally from page 100: "approving full reimbursement for massively lavish all-expenses-paid “business trips” taken by Trbovich and others, including Gygax, Grayson, and Redd, as well as contractors and friends of Trbovich, some of whom he had an ongoing personal and/or sexual relationship, including, without limitation, Candace Miller and Noura Ibrahim."

Phew. That's a lot of mentions.

Perhaps the most disturbing revelation is that Turbo was/is still using an AOL email account. I can't wrap my head around it ;)

In any case, these are simply allegations at the moment, and Luke and Gary Con are not named defendants in the lawsuit.

Luke reached out to me on Monday and explained that Turbo stepped in when Gary Con's operations manager left after being caught taking from the till and had volunteered to help the con through 2019 and that Turbo hasn't been involved with the Con in recent years. (Edit 9/30/21): For those inquiring, Dale Leonard WAS NOT the individual in question and left Gary Con Staff the year prior. Thank you Dale for the clarification.)

Luke has also offered to answer any questions I may have, but I'm leaving the questions to you, my readers. Add your questions to the comments below, or email me at tenkarsDOTtavern at that gmail thing. I'll put it all together and get them out to Luke

A special thank you to The Taverners that went above and beyond to provide me with clarifying details and links. Much appreciated.

Quick note, this will likely be a topic on tonight's Tavern Chat Livestream. It will fall under the This Week in Gaming Stupid segment ;)

The Tavern is supported by readers like you. The easiest way to support The Tavern is to shop via our affiliate links. DTRPGAmazon, and Humble Bundle are affiliate programs that support The Tavern. 

You can catch the daily Tavern Chat podcast on AnchorYouTube or wherever you listen to your podcast collection. - Tenkar  

Wednesday, May 5, 2021

Zak S vs Gen Con Lawsuit - All Current Paperwork for Your Perusal

I've been doing a deep dive into the Zak S vs Gen Con lawsuit that was dismissed last Friday, with prejudice. While the dive is certainly interesting, I have no desire to give out info that is publicly available, if admtedly difficult to find, in dribs and drabs.

Therefore, I'm linking a Dropbox folder with all of the documentation from the lawsuit within it.

Here's the link: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/pjgit0b2qlt5uhe/AAAMTNKjKVOrq3L9rerELrFTa?dl=0

Enjoy. The link should be live at least through the weekend.

The Tavern is supported by readers like you. The easiest way to support The Tavern is to shop via our affiliate links. DTRPGAmazon, and Humble Bundle are affiliate programs that support The Tavern.  You can catch the daily Tavern Chat podcast on AnchorYouTube or wherever you listen to your podcast collection. - Tenkar

Tuesday, May 4, 2021

Zak S vs Gen Con Lawsuit - I'm Digging Through a Document Dump

As always, a HUGE thank you to the Tavern's Community, as it was a member of the community that got me a full document dump of the lawsuit of Zak ' vs Gen Con, which was dismissed on April 30th, 2021.

I'll be delving into the rabbit hole today (and I expect longer). 

Those that want to hear my reactions to, and interpretations of, the documents I'll be reviewing, are advised to follow The Tavern's YouTube Channel at:

YouTube.com/TenkarsTavern

I'll be using the blog to share relevant documents, like the screenshot above.

The Tavern is supported by readers like you. The easiest way to support The Tavern is to shop via our affiliate links. DTRPGAmazon, and Humble Bundle are affiliate programs that support The Tavern.  You can catch the daily Tavern Chat podcast on AnchorYouTube or wherever you listen to your podcast collection. - Tenkar

Zak S' Lawsuit Against Gen Con WAS Dismissed - Full Document Attatched

Thanks to JoetheLawyer, we got to see the original document from the King Count, Washington Court dismissing Zak S' lawsuit against Gen Con. It still needs to be filed - thus it is with Zoom court sessions in the world of Covid.

I did the attached video a few minutes before Joe got his hands on the original document, so now we know it was truly dismissed.

Last week's YouTube recap may be delayed ;)

edit - We should have access to all of the paperwork filed and generated for this case. I'll read through it tomorrow and share what I can.

The Tavern is supported by readers like you. The easiest way to support The Tavern is to shop via our affiliate links. DTRPGAmazon, and Humble Bundle are affiliate programs that support The Tavern.  You can catch the daily Tavern Chat podcast on AnchorYouTube or wherever you listen to your podcast collection. - Tenkar


Monday, March 1, 2021

Zak Smith Sues Gen Con / Peter Adkison for Defamation, Interference with Business Expectancy, Violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act, and More


Let me say straight off the bat, my personal opinion of Zak Smith, based on my interactions with him online over the years, is that he is a wannabe bully. He is also extremely talented as an adventure writer and when he is on target he has few that can match him. I still think he's a POS.

All that being said, I suspect that Gen Con / Peter Adkison will be paying out on this lawsuit. As was pointed out to me, the filing was likely timed as the statute of limitations to file such a suit is 2 years from the date of the incident, and it's likely there were attempts to negotiate a settlement prior. Now, it's all public and NOT the kind of publicity Gen Con needs less than six months prior to - hopefully - going back to an in-person convention this year.

I personally think the major allegation is Interference with a Business Expectancy, as my understanding is that the bar that needs to be met to prove such is relatively lower in the State of Washington than other jursidictions.

I shared this news on the podcast last night, for those that aren't excited about reading a 13-page lawsuit:





Monday, January 25, 2021

News - Margaret Weis and Tracy Hickman to Publish a New Series Based on Classic Dragonlance

I suspected something was in the works when they had their lawsuit against WotC dismissed - Tenkar

Margaret Weis and Tracy Hickman to Publish a New Series Based on Classic Dragonlance - https://www.facebook.com/trhickman

Wilmington, NC – January 25, 2021 – Margaret Weis and Tracy Hickman are pleased to announce a multi-year licensing agreement with Wizards of the Coast to produce a new, three book series of Classic Dragonlance novels.

The new trilogy will return fans to the most beloved characters from the original novels along with introducing a new strong protagonist. The books will be published by Del Rey Books, an

imprint of Penguin Random House. Although a publishing date has not yet been formally set, they anticipate announcing when the first book will be released later this year.

“We couldn’t be happier to be returning to the world we love,” says Margaret Weis. “Dragonlance is what brought Tracy and I together so many years ago. We’re thrilled to be able to do this for existing lovers of Krynn while bringing our beloved characters to a new generation of readers.”

The first Classic Dragonlance novel, Dragons of Autumn Twilight, was written by Weis and Hickman and published in 1984. Since that time, more than 190 novels have been published in the setting. Weis and Hickman have collaborated on numerous series over the last 30 years including projects set within the world of Classic Dragonlance and outside of it. Two notable series are The Death Gate Cycle and The Darksword Series, both published by Penguin

Random House.

“We credit the fans of Dragonlance for making this journey possible,” says Tracy Hickman. “We wrote this series out of our thanks to them for this amazing life-long journey...and from our wish that they join us once more on the road to Solace.”

The license for the series was secured by Weis & Hickman in 2018. Their recent dispute with Wizards of the Coast was resolved at the end of 2020, with all parties pleased to have come to agreement on how best to move forward with the trilogy. All are focused on 

producing the best series possible and will not comment on the past dispute other than to say it has been resolved.

Watch for additional news from Weis and Hickman about Classic Dragonlance and other projects on the horizon in the coming months

Thursday, November 19, 2020

Update - Gale Force 9 Sues WotC in Excess of $950k - Text of Legal Filing

There are 51 pages to the lawsuit filed by Gale Force 9 in it's lawsuit against WotC. I am not sharing screenshots of all 51 pages below (which includes the original licensing agreement) - as it is simply too huge. I will, however, copy and paste the core of the filing.

Note: None of this would be possible without the help of members of The Tavern's Community. As always, I can't thank you enough - Tenkar

And now on to the show:

I. PARTIES

1. Plaintiff Gale Force Nine, LLC (“GF9”) is a Virginia Limited Liability Corporation with its principal place of business in Earlysville, Virginia. GF9 is wholly owned by Battlefront Miniatures Ltd. a New Zealand corporation with its principal place of business in Auckland, New Zealand. Battlefront New Zealand Ltd. is owned by John Paul Brisigotti a British citizen with his current residence in Virginia and Peter Simunovich a New Zealand citizen with his current residence in Auckland, New Zealand.

2. Defendant Wizards of the Coast LLC (“Wizards”) is a Delaware Limited Liability Company with its primary place of business located at 1600 Lind Avenue Southwest, Suite 400, Renton, Washington 98057.

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

3. This court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. GF9 and Wizards are diverse citizens and the amount in controversy, exclusive of costs and interest, exceeds seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00).

4. This Court also has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action for declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.

5. Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a) and (c) in that Defendant Wizards resides in this Judicial District and the parties have stipulated to venue in Washington State by contract, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

III. FACTS

6. GF9 is a manufacturer and distributor of figurines, board games, cards, books, and other products associated with sci-fi and fantasy titles and/or brands such as Dungeons & Dragons, Dr Who, Dune, Star Trek, and other similar titles.

7. Wizards is the owner of the Dungeons & Dragons brand and trademark. Wizards is a subsidiary of, and wholly owned by, Hasbro, Inc.

8. This dispute arises out of a Merchandise Licensing Agreement (“2017 Agreement”), entered into between Wizards and GF9 on February 22, 2017, relating to the translation and distribution in foreign markets of Dungeons & Dragons brand products and books. A true and correct copy of the 2017 Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

9. The 2017 Agreement was amended on or about May 1, 2018, to among other items, extend the term of the 2017 Agreement from February 7, 2021 to December 31, 2021.

10. The parties also entered into a Merchandising Licensing Agreement on May 1, 2008 (“2008 Agreement”) for the manufacture and worldwide distribution of Dungeons & Dragons brand products. A true and correct copy of the 2008 Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

A. Wizards Failure to Approve Products Previously Agreed Upon for Release

11. Under to the 2017 Agreement, products planned for translation and release in the different foreign markets for the coming calendar year are agreed upon between Wizards and GF9 in December of the then current calendar year (sometimes bleeding into the beginning of the next calendar year) and a product release schedule is established. Based off this release schedule, GF9, through its translation and distribution subcontractors in their respective foreign markets, plan for and begin translation and production of the products several months before the scheduled release date.

12. Products scheduled for release in the coming year are then added to the Wizards’ approval platform prior to the planned release date and Wizards gives the final approval for the distribution subcontractor to release the product for sale.

13. From the inception of the 2017 Agreement to June 2020, all the products which were included on the approved release schedule were subsequently approved by Wizards through its approval platform without comment or correction. Wizards has occasionally taken longer than the designated approval process time to provide its approval, but prior to June 2020, had never declined to approve a product that had been included on the agreed upon release schedule.

14. The 2020 release schedule for products licensed under the 2017 Agreement was approved by Wizards and GF9 in December of 2019.

15. Subsequent revisions to the release schedule were made each month in January, February, March, and April, primarily to show delay to planned product release dates that were being affected by the COVID 19 pandemic.

16. On or about May 18, 2020, Wizards communicated to GF9 its desire to end the 2017 Agreement and the 2008 Agreement one year early – on December 31, 2020 rather than the planned expiration date of December 31, 2021.

17. The parties communicated over the next several months in an attempt to strike a compromise; however, no agreement has been reached.

18. During the discussions regarding Wizards’ requested early end to the 2017 and 2008 Agreements, Wizards informed GF9 that certain products licensed under the 2017 Agreement, which were included in the parties’ agreed to release schedule, were not going to be approved.

19. Wizards did not note any issue with the products, yet declined to approve the products for release.

20. All of the products Wizards declined to approve were listed on the approved release schedule and updates. These unapproved products are not wholly new products, but rather new translations of previously approved and released products – in English and other languages – planned for release by Wizards approved translation and distribution subcontractors in Wizards approved foreign markets.

21. From June 2020 to October 2020, GF9 repeatedly communicated with Wizards to continue to seek approval of the products, but Wizards continued to decline to approve the products and would not provide any rationale for its failure to do so.

22. GF9 and its foreign translation and distribution subcontractors spent significant time and money translating and preparing the products included on the release schedule.

23. The course of dealing between Wizards and GF9 established that GF9 and the foreign subcontractors could rely on the mutually agreed upon release schedule to plan for and begin translation and production of products.

24. On November 9, 2020, GF9 sent a letter to Wizards notifying it that GF9 considered Wizards’ failure to approve submitted products was a breach of the 2017 Agreement and demanded that Wizards’ cure its breach. As of today, Wizards has not done so.

B. Wizards Allegation of Breach of Contract by GF9

25. On November 9, 2020, Wizards sent to GF9 a notice of breach of the 2017 Agreement.

26. Wizards’ breach notice alleged two breaches of the 2017 Agreement by GF9 through the actions of two of GF9’s foreign translation and distribution subcontractors.

27. First, Wizards alleged that GF9 breached the 2017 Agreement through the actions of TRPG Club (GF9’s Korean translation and distribution subcontractor). Wizards alleged that certain unidentified products translated into Korean and distributed by TRPG Club were of low quality, including translations that were poorly done and included inaccurate, missing, and offensive translations. Wizards breach notice went on to further allege that TRPG Club failed to provide adequate customer service to consumers of Dungeons & Dragons materials.

28. Second, Wizards alleged a breach of the 2017 Agreement due to the actions of Black Book Editions FR (“BBE”). Wizards alleged that after BBE translated certain Dungeons & Dragons books into French, it republished certain portions of the translated product under its own brand “Heros & Dragons.”

29. Wizards’ notice of breach states that it intends to terminate of the 2017 Agreement, unless GF9 remedies its breach to Wizards’ satisfaction within the applicable time periods for cure. 30. However, the products translated and distributed by TRPG Club, which are the subject of Wizards’ allegation of breach, were submitted in their final translated form to Wizards and approved by Wizards for release. Wizards informed GF9 that it had reviewers on its staff who were fluent in Korean who reviewed the product as translated and did not note a single correction or issue.

31. GF9 disputes that the TRPG Club translation was of a poor quality, and TRPG Club provided a report stating the adequacy of its translation that was subsequently provided to Wizards, on November 12, 2019.

32. When the translation quality issue was brought to the attention of GF9 and Wizards, GF9 sought direction from Wizards on the action necessary to rectify the alleged translation issue. Although GF9 and TRPG Club disputed that any significant deficiency in the translation was present in the products, GF9 offered to remove the products from the market. However, Wizards directed GF9 to leave the products in the market and to not renew its contract with TRPG Club or submit any additional products for approval.

33. Acting on Wizards direction, GF9 did not take any further action related to the translated products, informed TRPG Club that its contract would not be renewed, and has not submitted any additional TRPG Club products for approval or release.

34. GF9 cured any breach of the 2017 Agreement it may have committed related to the alleged poor translation when it enacted the actions directed by Wizards.

35. Wizards’ breach notice further alleged a breach of the 2017 Agreement by the actions of TRPG Club for customer complaints about damaged books and orders that never arrived. 36. GF9 is aware of very few customer complaints related to TRPG Club produced products all of which occurred in fall 2019 (one year before the breach notice). Customer complaints stem largely from products being damaged in transit. The amount of products for which customers complained is extremely minimal and within the expected threshold of transit damaged products experienced in all other markets (including the US market).

37. GF9 worked with TRPG Club to ensure that each of the customer complaints TRPG Club received were rectified by either providing replacement products or a refund as requested by the respective customer.

38. GF9 and TRPG Club rectified each of the customer issues and therefore no breach exists. Even said breach did occur, it has since been cured.

39. GF9 disputes that it breached the 2017 Agreement due to the alleged actions of BBE in utilizing Wizards’ intellectual property for its own benefit.

40. GF9 does not have an obligation under the 2017 Agreement to prosecute and defend Wizards intellectual property from use by the translation and distribution subcontractors. The 2017 Agreement provides Wizards the sole right to determine whether or not any action shall be taken on account of an intellectual property infringement and GF9 is required to assist Wizards in this defense, if requested to do so.

41. On information and belief, Wizards has not instituted an action against BBE.

42. However, even if GF9 may have some responsibility under the 2017 Agreement for

BBE alleged infringement, BBE did not utilize Wizards’ intellectual property gained through its relationship with GF9. BBE produced and distributed for sale its Heros & Dragons product in the fall of 2016, approximately ten months before it entered into the contract with GF9 to translate and distribute Dungeons & Dragons products. BBE’s Heros & Dragons product utilized text previously translated under a Dungeons & Dragons open gaming license, which permits the Dungeons & Dragons core rules and mechanics of game play to be used by others.

43. Upon information and belief, Wizards was aware of the Heros & Dragons products already in the market prior to GF9’s agreement with BBE to translate and distribute Dungeons & Dragons products in the French market. Wizards approved BBE as the French partner with knowledge that Heroes & Dragons already existed in the market.

44. Under its contract with GF9, when BBE translated the Dungeons & Dragons products, it utilized the same translated text it had previously translated and used in its Heros & Dragons products (i.e. the open gaming license core rules and game play mechanics). BBE did not use intellectual property gained through its contractual relationship with GF9 for its Heros & Dragons products, instead when translating the Dungeons & Dragons products it used translated text it already possessed before the contract with GF9 to expedite the translation process.

45. Upon Wizards informing GF9 of its belief that BBE was utilizing Wizards’ intellectual property in its Heros & Dragons products, GF9 entered into discussions with BBE to terminate the existing translation and distribution agreement between BBE and GF9, to purchase all outstanding stock of Heros & Dragons at GF9’s expense, to pull all existing Heros & Dragons products from the market, and to destroy all product purchased.

46. Agreement between GF9 and BBE was reached to accomplish the above stated objectives, and GF9 informed Wizards of the agreement. After reaching agreement with BBE and informing Wizards, Wizards required that BBE sign an admission of liability indicating that it had improperly utilized Wizards’ intellectual property. BBE refused to sign the admission of liability that Wizards demanded and the deal between GF9 and BBE was not completed.

47. Because BBE refused to sign the admission of liability demanded by Wizards, and upon the request of Wizards, in November 2019, GF9 terminated BBE for breach of its agreements with GF9 for failure to timely pay its royalties. The termination of BBE and settlement of outstanding claims was concluded fully in May 2020, with full agreement on termination and settlement from Wizards. A new French partner was approved and the market became active again in February 2020.

48. GF9 has no control over BBE after termination of its agreement with BBE and therefore, cannot cure any breach that Wizards has alleged relating to BBE’s continued use of intellectual property in BBE’s Heros & Dragons product.

IV. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION – BREACH OF CONTRACT

49. GF9 incorporates by this reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 48 as though fully set forth herein.

50. Wizards and GF9 entered into the 2017 Agreement on February 22, 2017.

51. The 2017 Agreement provides that “...[GF9] will have the right to translate and the exclusive rights to manufacture, publish, market, sell and distribute physical translated versions of the Dungeons & Dragons’ Starter Set, Player’s Handbook, Dungeon Master’s Guide, and Monster Manual (and at [Wizards’] sole discretion, other Dungeons & Dragons products as provided to [GF9] by [Wizards].” (Emphasis in original).

52. Wizards provided approval to GF9 to translate, manufacture, and distribute in foreign markets certain other Dungeons & Dragons products.

53. After being provided Wizards approval for other products, GF9 and Wizards agreed in the 2020 release schedule to release these previously approved products in certain approved markets.

54. Wizards actions in failing to approve products under the 2017 Agreement, despite the products being included on the mutually agreed upon release schedule, is a breach of the 2017 Agreement.

55. As a direct and proximate result of Wizards’ breach of contract GF9 suffered and will continue to suffer damages in an amount to be proven at trial, and which on information and belief, is in excess of $950,000.00.

V. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION – BREACH OF IMPLIED DUTY OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING

56. GF9 incorporates by this reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 55 as though fully set forth herein.

57. The 2017 Agreement between Wizards and GF9 contained an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by and between the parties, which prohibits them from engaging in any activity or conduct that would prevent the other party from receiving the benefit of the contract.

58. Wizards actions in declining to approve products under the 2017 Agreement, despite the products being included on the mutually agreed upon release schedule, is contrary to the established course of dealing between the parties and a breach of Wizards’ duty of good faith and fair dealing.

59. Wizards actions in declining to approve products included on the release schedule deprived GF9 and its translation and distribution subcontractors of the benefit of the contract and had the effect of interfering with and destroying the value of the 2017 Agreement.

60. As a direct and proximate result of Wizards’ breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing GF9 suffered and will continue to suffer damages in an amount to be proven at trial, and which on information and belief, is in excess of $950,000.00.

VI. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION – DECLARATORY RELIEF AND TEMPORARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

61. GF9 incorporates by this reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 60 as though fully set forth herein.

62. Wizards sent to GF9 a notice of breach on November 9, 2020, alleging breach of contract by GF9 for the actions of its prior translation and distribution subcontractors – TRPG Club and BBE.

63. Wizards’ breach notice states that it will terminate the 2017 Agreement, if the breaches alleged by Wizards are not cured the full satisfaction of Wizards within the respective cure period provided in the 2017 Agreement.

64. Wizards’ accusations are without merit, because (1) Wizards approved for release the TRPG Clubs’ final translation of the product it now alleges to have been poorly translated; (2) TRPG Club’s translation was not of poor quality; (3) GF9 and TRPG Club adequately and appropriately resolved any customer complaints about damaged or incomplete products; (4) GF9 followed the direction of Wizards in leaving the complained of products in the Korean market, not renewing TRPG Club’s contract, and not approving any additional products for release by TRPG Club; (5) GF9 is not responsible under the 2017 Agreement for the alleged improper use of Wizards’ intellectual property by BBE; (6) BBE used open gaming license content (core rules and game play mechanics) that Wizards permitted to be utilized by the public; and (7) BBE’s Heros & Dragons product(s) were published in the fall of 2016, ten months before BBE and GF9 entered into contract for translation and distribution of Dungeons & Dragons products and Wizards knew of the BBE’s Heros & Dragons product and the use of open gaming license content prior to GF9 entering into contract with BBE.

65. GF9 herein seeks a determination by the court that GF9 is not in breach of the 2017 Agreement, such that any termination by Wizards would be wrongful.

66. Absent injunctive relief, GF9 will be irreparably harmed if Wizards is allowed to terminate the 2017 Agreement on the basis of the alleged breach of contract. As such, GF9 herein seeks to enjoin Wizards from terminating the 2017 Agreement based on the alleged breaches in its November 9, 2020 Notice.

67. Under the 2008 and 2017 Agreements, if there is a default and termination under one of them, it automatically causes a default (and likely termination) of the other. As such, Wizards is expected to terminate the 2017 Agreement, based on the meritless reasons set forth in its November 9, 2020 letter, which will then lead to the termination of the 2008 Agreement. The loss of both these Agreements will cause devastating, irreparable harm to GF9.

68. If wrongfully terminated, GF9 will be forced to lay off a significant amount of its work force – as the Dungeons & Dragons products account for a substantial portion of GF9’s yearly revenue. GF9 will suffer significant impacts to its reputation in the industry – with distribution partners to whom GF9 supplies the manufactured products and licensors of other products with whom GF9 currently works and desires to work. Further, GF9’s manufacturing partners with whom GF9 has contracted to manufacture Dungeons & Dragons and other products – will be significantly harmed, as GF9 will be forced to terminate its foreign translation and distribution subcontractors and face legal challenges in numerous jurisdictions worldwide. Finally, GF9 will lose the continued revenue expected to be earned under the 2017 Agreement for the remainder of its term.

69. If Wizards is permitted to terminate the 2017 Agreement, GF9 is required to immediately cease production of any additional products and very shortly thereafter either sell to Wizards the products it has already produced or destroy the entirety of its remaining stock of produced products.

70. If Wizards termination of the 2017 Agreement is allowed to proceed, GF9 will face significant hardships as described above.

VII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Gale Force Nine, LLC, having set forth the above fact and having alleged the above first through third causes of action, prays for judgment against Defendant Wizards of the Coast LLC as follows:

1. Judgement for monetary damages against Wizards in an amount to be proven at trial, and which on information and belief, is in excess of $950,000.00;

2. An award of attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by GF9 in prosecuting the foregoing claims against Wizards;

3. For declaratory relief finding that GF9 has not breached the 2017 Agreement for the breaches alleged by Wizards in its November 9, 2020 notice of breach;

4. For permanent injunctive relief restraining Wizards from:

    a. Terminating the 2017 Agreement for the breach of contract alleged in its November 9, 2020 notice of breach;

5. For any other costs, including interest, authorized by law; and 

6. For such other relief as the court may deem just and equitable.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

 Plaintiff hereby demands a jury trial of all issues in the Complaint that are triable to a jury.

DATED THIS 17th day of November, 2020.

OLES MORRISON RINKER & BAKER LLP

/s/ Eric P. Forner

Thomas R. Krider, WSBA #29490 

Eric P. Former, WSBA #49264


The Tavern is supported by readers like you. The easiest way to support The Tavern is to shop via our affiliate links. DTRPGAmazon, and Humble Bundle are the affiliate programs that support The Tavern.  

You can catch the daily Tavern Chat podcast on AnchorYouTube, or wherever you listen to your podcast collection.

Don't forget to subscribe to The Tavern's weekly Newsletter! We currently have 150 subscribers. When we hit 200 subscribers, I'll award 2 random subscribers a $10 DTRPG Gift Certificate.  


News - Gale Force Nine, LLC v. Wizards of the Coast LLC (Breach of Contract)


I woke this morning to a PM from one of the Taverner's with a screen pic showing a filing in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington by Gale Force Nine with WotC as the defendant. 

I can find nothing about it on the web, and my access to the filing is very limited, but it appears to be in regards to Breach of Contract, Breach of Implied Duty of Good Faith, and Fair Dealing. Remind anyone of a recent lawsuit WotC is also defending oneself against?


Gale Force Nine is a third party partner of Wizards of the Coast.

The Tavern is supported by readers like you. The easiest way to support The Tavern is to shop via our affiliate links. DTRPGAmazon, and Humble Bundle are the affiliate programs that support The Tavern.  

You can catch the daily Tavern Chat podcast on AnchorYouTube, or wherever you listen to your podcast collection.

Don't forget to subscribe to The Tavern's weekly Newsletter! We currently have 150 subscribers. When we hit 200 subscribers, I'll award 2 random subscribers a $10 DTRPG Gift Certificate.  



Monday, August 7, 2017

Games Workshop is Being Sued For $62.5M - By a Retailer / Lawyer



Looks like there's some money to be squeezed out of Games Workshop - or a the very least, a valiant attempt to do so.

SpikeyBits has the details of a $62.5M lawsuit filed "in the US Federal Court of Southern Florida alleging six criminal violations of US law and is seeking $62.5 million in equitable relief from Games Workshop.

Moore alleges violations of the U.S. Law and RICO under 18 & 15 U.S. CODE, including but not limited to Fraud, Price Fixing, Tortious Interference, Breach of Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Restraint of Trade, Conspiracy and Antitrust Violations."

That's one hell of a shot across the bow.

There's a lot to the article and I'm not going to attempt to break it down, but these two paragraphs stood out to me:
For near-30-years GW has always maintained that we sellers can “Set any price we want for the items we wholesale from them (GW)”. Yet, more recently GW ‘asked’ its retailers “not to have a ‘shopping cart’ on our websites – since they were adding one to theirs”!? Soon after, without agreement from Stores – GW ‘asked’ that “advertised prices (on the internet) not be more than 20%-Off MSRP – directly contradicting their previous assurances and our extant long-held Verbal Good-Faith Contract. Later, (unknown to Plaintiff) GW said 15%-off. 
Eventually (and unknown to your Plaintiff Stores) GW ‘claimed’ to have quietly instituted a ‘policy’ to outright ‘prohibit’ any/all sales which used internet.
Go to SpikeyBits and read it for yourself. IANAL and I have no clue how this will play out. Still, interesting to see the company quick to threaten to sue over its IP being sued over its IP ;)


Tenkar's Tavern is supported by various affiliate programs, including Amazon, RPGNow,
and Humble Bundle as well as Patreon. Your patronage is appreciated and helps keep the
lights on and the taps flowing. Your Humble Bartender, Tenkar

Blogs of Inspiration & Erudition