I've been running an ACKS campaign for a couple of months now, and if there is one main difference between ACKS and other retroclones (besides the rules for high level / ruler style play) is the inclusion of racial specific classes. Dwarven Vaultguards are very similar to human fighters, but it is a specific class available only to dwarves. Elven Nightblades are a magic-user/thief combo class that takes some abilities from each, but not all (no open locks or find / remove traps, much to my party's dismay).
The thing is, these classes are unique to each race. They are different from the standard classes. It's been an excellent roleplay tool, and it helps folks think of races in the game as other than just a set of adjustments to a class.
Now, I'm not saying you can't have dwarven fighters or elven magic-users in your campaign - I'm sure I will when I run my next campaign of length, which will probably be a slightly houseruled Swords & Wizardry Complete game. But I think there should be options available for those that want to play something that more "racial specific" in the way of class.
It might also be an excellent way to give the halfling a better definition other that "short thief".
Hopefully I'll have something for the morning, and if I do, I'll post it here. Well, not THIS post mind you, but a new post, but here on THIS blog ;)
Skills - another thing that old D&D got (mostly) right?
-
When I was still interested in contemporary D&D, I noticed that there are *only
a few skills that are not necessarily equivalent to ability scores*.
- Nat...
4 hours ago
I think this is absolutely essential to giving each campaign or world setting it's own feel. To me part of the beauty of B/X, ACKS, etc is the simplicity of Race-as-Class. Each race should be unique in it's outlook and abilities - otherwise you're just a short fighter or weak fighter/magic-user with a couple extra abilities.
ReplyDelete