So, There is "Apparently" a Swords & Wizardry White Box Light on the Market - How Could This Go Wrong?
There are right ways to do things and there are wrong ways to do things. White Box Light does it the wrong way. And than does it wrong again. And again.
First, its the logo. The Swords & Wizardry graphic is obviously a screenshot.
Notice the fuzziness to the lettering? I don't think you can title your product as shown. But they didn't, kinda. Its listed as White Box Light on RPGNow.
But wait, here's the copyright claim in the OGL:
I'm pretty sure you can't claim trademark to Swords & Wizardry White Box Light. Not only is Swords & Wizardry trademarked by Frog God Games / Matt Finch, but so is Swords & Wizardry White Box and Swords & Wizardry Light. Also, they are laying claim to the logo for such. Which logo is that? The Swords & Wizardry logo? Or the cover page itself? Is THAT the logo?
Actually, I enjoy this from the RPGNow product listing. Its quotes praising the product. Guess what? No one is credited...
This was brought to my attention as it was questioned if myself or FGG was involved in said product. Obviously, the answer is no, we are not.
But hey, at least they fixed fighters:
Spells are listed for clerics and magic-users but are not explained or described.
Now, either this is an AC chart where classes improve in AC per level, or its a to hit chart where its harder to hit as you gain level:
Fuck it. My head hurts. If imitation is the better part of flattery, this is simply painful.
The Minotaur for Old-School Essentials
*Requirements:* Minimum STR 9, Minimum CON 9
*Prime Requisite:* STR and CON
*Hit Dice:* 1d10
*Maximum Level:* 8
*Armor:* Leather, including shield...