Tenkar's Tavern: Talking About "Players' Maps"...

Monday, February 24, 2014

Talking About "Players' Maps"...

I have no idea if this map was the players' map of a homegrown dungeon, a module or something from Dungeon magazine.

I do like the idea that they made notations for the areas to check more thoroughly when there is no where else to go. Apparently they also found the well down.

At least it wasn't one of those dungeons where I filled in every block of the hex paper with dungeon. Because I have those ;)

4 comments:

jdh417February 24, 2014 at 11:01 PM
"Yes, I remember that room with the double doors. I killed a bunch of giant rats in there. Good times."
ReplyDelete
Replies
Mark ThomasFebruary 25, 2014 at 8:50 AM
One of the aspects of pre-battlemat/pre-vtt play I miss is describing dungeons to players and then seeing what they draw compared to the original.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Jason ZavodaFebruary 25, 2014 at 1:08 PM
The verbal description maps could become interesting but unless you had a player with a mapping fetish they weren't too popular in my past gaming circles.
ReplyDelete
Replies
RustyFebruary 25, 2014 at 6:42 PM
That looks really similar to the map for Zork II - did you ever play that? Maybe that game helped inspire this map?
ReplyDelete
Replies

Why "Swords & Wizardry?"

Believe me when I say I have them all in dead tree format. I have OSRIC in full size, trade paperback and the Player's Guide. I have LL and the AEC (and somewhere OEC, but I can't find it at the moment). Obviously I have Basic Fantasy RPG. Actually, I have the whole available line in print. Way too much Castles & Crusades. We all know my love for the DCC RPG. I even have Dark Dungeons in print, the Delving Deeper boxed set, Astonishing Swordsmen & Sorcerers of Hyperborea. BOTH editions of LotFP's Weird Fantasy and some dead tree copies of the Greyhawk Grognards Adventures Dark & Deep

I am so deep in the OSR when I come up for breath it's for the OSR's cousin, Tunnels & Trolls

So, out of all that, why Swords & Wizardry? Why, when I have been running a AD&D 1e / OSRIC campaign in Rappan Athuk am I using Swords & Wizardry and it's variant, Crypts & Things, for the second campaign? (Actually, now running a S&W Complete campaign, soon to be with multiple groups)

Because the shit works.

It's easy for lapsed gamers to pick up and feel like they haven't lost a step. I can house rule it and it doesn't break. It plays so close to the AD&D of my youth and college years (S&W Complete especially) that it continually surprises me. Just much less rules hopping than I remember. (my God but I can run it nearly without the book)

I grab and pick and steal from just about all OSR and Original resources. They seem to fit into S&W with little fuss. It may be the same with LL and the rest, but for me the ease of use fit's my expectations with S&W.

Even the single saving throw. That took me longer to adjust to, but even that seems like a natural to me now. Don't ask me why, it just does. Maybe it's the simplicity of it. At 45 52, simplicity and flexibility while remaining true to the feel of the original is an OSR hat trick for me ;)

Swords & Wizardry Light - Forum

RPGNow

Monday, February 24, 2014

Talking About "Players' Maps"...

4 comments:

Blogs of Inspiration & Erudition