Remember the marketing for the D&D 4e rules? The mocking of Gnomes and general tearing apart of all things 3.5e.
Do you think WotC has learned their lesson?
Will they actually be able to introduce a new edition without they themselves fanning the flames of the next edition war like they fanned the flames in the last edition war?
Will gnomes be brought back as a core race, or relegated to the MM as they were at the start of 4e?
Does it even matter?
Have any of you actually played a Gnome in any edition of Dungeons & Dragons?
Do you own a Garden Gnome?
Do Garden Gnomes scare you?
The fate of 5e rests in your hands...
Skills - another thing that old D&D got (mostly) right?
-
When I was still interested in contemporary D&D, I noticed that there are *only
a few skills that are not necessarily equivalent to ability scores*.
- Nat...
1 hour ago
1. Yes.
ReplyDelete2. No.
3. No.
4. I dunno.
5. No.
6. No.
7. No.
8. Yes.
Thanks Matt! I'll tally up the answers later and forward to WotC ;)
ReplyDeleteI love gnomes but have always hated D&D gnomes - creepy dwarf-wannabes. I'd be happy to see them consigned to the Monster List in 5e, just like in OD&D.
ReplyDeleteGno gnomes!
ReplyDeleteI never really cared for Gnomes, atleast not the illusionist variety. Clockwork Gnomes can stay, but fay gnomes got to go.
ReplyDeleteWhat about the fourth ed core races? I'm not a fan, but my wife will be mighty upset if the Eladrin aren't core.
I'm hoping that they go a little more Hobbit and a little less bayou Gypsy with Halflings this time.